quantum:customer_profiles
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
quantum:customer_profiles [2024/08/03 09:24] – [Patent-Centric] baw-geordie | quantum:customer_profiles [2024/08/07 10:11] (current) – [Patent-Centric] baw-geordie | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Patent-Centric==== | ====Patent-Centric==== | ||
===As long as we cannot self-finance=== | ===As long as we cannot self-finance=== | ||
+ | ===...=== | ||
|**Customer Profile**|**Problem Statement**|**Offering**|**Example**| | |**Customer Profile**|**Problem Statement**|**Offering**|**Example**| | ||
|Corporation who wants a **much faster processor** and can afford to fund the research and build it | In ultra-high-stakes competition, | |Corporation who wants a **much faster processor** and can afford to fund the research and build it | In ultra-high-stakes competition, | ||
|Laboratory who wants to be associated with our research into hardware, a **much faster processor** | FOMO in field of quantum computing | Status as primary sponsor| MIT, Rahman Institute, Berkeley, Oak Ridge... | | |Laboratory who wants to be associated with our research into hardware, a **much faster processor** | FOMO in field of quantum computing | Status as primary sponsor| MIT, Rahman Institute, Berkeley, Oak Ridge... | | ||
|Hardware manufacturer who wants to be associated with a **much faster processor** and can afford to fund the research and build it | Our designs have maxed out and our customers want moar fastee | Full or Partial ownership of RequisiteQ and its patent and/or percentage of processor sales| Suppliers of Row 1 above e.g. Taiwan, Intel, IBM... | | |Hardware manufacturer who wants to be associated with a **much faster processor** and can afford to fund the research and build it | Our designs have maxed out and our customers want moar fastee | Full or Partial ownership of RequisiteQ and its patent and/or percentage of processor sales| Suppliers of Row 1 above e.g. Taiwan, Intel, IBM... | | ||
- | |Corporations selling optimization services | Primary competitive constraint is performance of optimizer | Quantum-inspired Optimization services supported by RLADP QIAGI | IBM, Azure, AWS, Gurobi, InfinityQ... | | + | |Corporations selling optimization services | Primary competitive constraint is performance of optimizer |
- | |Corporations buying optimization services | Significant competitive constraint is pace of complex computer-aided decision-making | Quantum-inspired Optimization services services supported by RLADP QIAGI | American Airlines, Delta Airlines, Tesla, Google...| | + | |Corporations buying optimization services | Significant competitive constraint is pace of complex computer-aided decision-making |
===Once we are making and selling first-gen hardware based on the patent=== | ===Once we are making and selling first-gen hardware based on the patent=== | ||
|**Customer Profile**|**Problem Statement**|**Offering**|**Example**| | |**Customer Profile**|**Problem Statement**|**Offering**|**Example**| | ||
- | |Corporations selling optimization services | Primary competitive constraint is performance of optimizer | tQQO boxes or cloud access | IBM, Azure, AWS, Gurobi, InfinityQ... | | + | |Corporations selling optimization services | Primary competitive constraint is performance of optimizer | tQQO boxes or cloud access |
- | |Corporations buying optimization services | Significant competitive constraint is pace of complex computer-aided decision-making | optimization services supported by tQQO boxes or cloud access | American Airlines, Delta Airlines, Tesla, Google...| | + | |Corporations buying optimization services | Significant competitive constraint is pace of complex computer-aided decision-making | optimization services supported by tQQO boxes or cloud access |
quantum/customer_profiles.1722691466.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/03 09:24 by baw-geordie