quantum:meeting_agendas_minutes_and_notes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| quantum:meeting_agendas_minutes_and_notes [2024/04/07 12:29] – baw-geordie | quantum:meeting_agendas_minutes_and_notes [2024/04/07 12:30] (current) – baw-geordie | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| [[April 07 2024]] | [[April 07 2024]] | ||
| + | |||
| [[March 10 2024]] | [[March 10 2024]] | ||
| - | ===== March 10, 2024 Annotated Agenda ===== | + | |
| - | * draft a multi-agent utility function for the WG | + | |
| - | * success criteria for the working group for multiple stakeholders required products for several people | + | |
| - | * Short term | + | |
| - | * generate resources on a timely basis | + | |
| - | * do not burn out | + | |
| - | * Populate RQ.com landing page - single page - by Friday Mar 22 | + | |
| - | * populate Requisite Q website front pages by the time the simulations are ready | + | |
| - | * develop corporate documents | + | |
| - | * develop [[Investor Documents]] | + | |
| - | * organize Paul's writings | + | |
| - | * [[blog posts]] generate website traffic measurable by SEO that shows growth | + | |
| - | * Long term | + | |
| - | * Show that our documents are useful to running the company and getting investors | + | |
| - | * Generate the option to come on board RQ full-time | + | |
| - | * it is also the generalized utility function (e.g., minima, maxima, target, confluence of interest, required products, etc.) | + | |
| - | * Products | + | |
| - | * Create Project documentation tree | + | |
| - | * Create Project Taxonomy | + | |
| - | * Create Project Glossary/ | + | |
| - | * establish housekeeping: | + | |
| - | * backlog | + | |
| - | * Gary will standup a RequisiteQ wiki under the https:// | + | |
| - | * calendar | + | |
| - | * Geordie will standup a shared calendar | + | |
| - | * Working agreement | + | |
| - | * Geordie, Nathan, and Gary are pleased to work together to define and articulate project narratives. | + | |
| - | * catalog our understanding of the audiences and media for narratives | + | |
| - | * We need to add a catalog of resources accessible on the wiki | + | |
| - | * We have shared workspaces based on audiences | + | |
| - | * Internal project team (Confidential access) | + | |
| - | * Investors (Restricted access) | + | |
| - | * Pitch Deck Evolution | + | |
| - | * • The top 10 +/- 2deck (top-down approach) “What Amit needs, . . .” | + | |
| - | * o Classic investor pitch deck | + | |
| - | * o How can we array the data for each slide in the deck | + | |
| - | * o What is the visualization | + | |
| - | * Qbits, squids, in a helium bath | + | |
| - | * Hardware Problem Space Solution Space | + | |
| - | * o Amit will join the Sunday narrative working group meeting | + | |
| - | * • The middle-out approach to drawing out the relationship between a top-down and bottom-up approach | + | |
| - | * o our context | + | |
| - | * o the problem space | + | |
| - | * o the potential solution space | + | |
| - | * o our product(s) | + | |
| - | * Project Plans | + | |
| - | * • Technical considerations (1 page briefs, top priority) | + | |
| - | * o Outcomes (So what!?) | + | |
| - | * o Foundational technology | + | |
| - | * o Applications | + | |
| - | * o Development path | + | |
| - | * • Technical & Financial Considerations | + | |
| - | * • Financial considerations | + | |
| - | * o Budget template | + | |
| - | * o labor considerations | + | |
| - | * o contracting terms & conditions | + | |
| - | * Market considerations (for-profit) | + | |
| - | * Objective considerations (non-profit) | + | |
| - | * Lessons learned provisional patents | + | |
| - | * o Public (Open access) | + | |
| - | * Recruitment | + | |
| - | * Media resources | + | |
| - | * • Audio | + | |
| - | * • Video | + | |
| - | * • Web site | + | |
| - | * • Written content | + | |
| - | * o Op ed | + | |
| - | * o Magazine articles | + | |
| - | * o Abstracts for national and international fora | + | |
| - | * o Technical papers and presentations | + | |
| - | * • Funding Development | + | |
| - | * o Grants | + | |
| - | * o Contracts | + | |
| - | * o Financing | + | |
| - | * Equity | + | |
| - | * Debt | + | |
| - | * Grants | + | |
| - | * o Audience drives the presentation | + | |
| - | * Non-profit entity typically has defined goal or program objective to achieve and we must establish relevance | + | |
| - | * For-profit entity typically wants to understand the ROI both a direct monetary return and the potential for disrupting and/or making new markets. | + | |
| - | * o Find the way to yes | + | |
| - | * Only poke the bears we have to | + | |
| - | * | + | |
| - | * - make a shortlist of necessary narrative materials | + | |
| - | * - review existing materials for suitability | + | |
| - | * | + | |
| - | * Things that we need to include . . . | + | |
| - | * • Investor brief, accessible | + | |
| - | * • Inspirational engagement brief, bigger than yourself | + | |
| - | * • Relevant technical concept and applicability in one or more contexts | + | |
| - | * | + | |
| - | * Priorities | + | |
| - | * • Technically correct -- Paul | + | |
| - | * • Emotional hooks – Amit | + | |
| - | * • So what!? – Investors | + | |
| - | * Concerns | + | |
| - | * • Conceptual markers | + | |
| - | * • Use cases | + | |
| - | * • We need stories that provide conceptual entry points | + | |
| - | * • Tell the story from the theory to the application and from the application to theory | + | |
| - | * | + | |
| - | * | + | |
quantum/meeting_agendas_minutes_and_notes.1712507380.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/07 12:29 by baw-geordie