User Tools

Site Tools


quantum:requisiteq

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
quantum:requisiteq [2024/04/01 22:01] – [Multi-Agent Utility Function for the WG] baw-geordiequantum:requisiteq [2024/08/02 22:49] (current) – [Multi-Agent Utility Function for the WG] baw-geordie
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Welcome to the RequisiteQ Narrative WG Wiki! ====== ====== Welcome to the RequisiteQ Narrative WG Wiki! ======
 +
 +===== RequisiteQ Operating Plan =====
 +
 +==== RequisiteQ Organization Level Prioritized Objectives|Projects|Actions =====
 +  * Establish a virtual enterprise framework that dynamically recognizes participant contributions (e.g., Slicing pie).
 +  * Establish a means of organization under which objectives, projects, and actions can be identified, curated, and acted on, providing for cooperation, collaboration, and competition as warranted.
 +  * Define roles, responsibilities, and authority 
 +  * Create viable corporate entities as necessary and/or entity consortia for program execution.
 +  * Define the problem space RequisiteQ seeks to address 
 +  * Define RequisiteQ's contribution to the potential solution space
 +
 +==== RequisiteQ WG Prioritized Objectives|Projects|Actions ====
 +  * Committee of the whole
 +  * Narrative Working Group (__Geordie__, Nathan, Gary)
 +  * Simulation Working Group (__George__, Geordie, Paul, Gary)
 +  * Proposal Working Group (???)
 +
 +
  
 [[Meeting Agendas Minutes and Notes]] [[Meeting Agendas Minutes and Notes]]
Line 5: Line 23:
 I.e. success criteria for the working group for multiple stakeholders requiring products for several people I.e. success criteria for the working group for multiple stakeholders requiring products for several people
    
-  * Short term+=== Short term ===
     * resources generated on a timely basis     * resources generated on a timely basis
     * members do not burn out     * members do not burn out
-    * RQ.com landing page - single page - written by Friday April 5 +    * useful [[corporate documents]] developed 
-    * Requisite Q website front pages written by the time the simulations are ready +      * RQ.com landing page - single page - written by Friday April 5 
-    * useful corporate documents developed+      * Requisite Q website front pages written by the time the simulations are ready
     * useful [[Investor Documents]] developed     * useful [[Investor Documents]] developed
-    * Paul's writings organized so that new team members can find what they need +    * Paul's writings are organized so that new team members can find what they need 
     * [[blog posts]] generate website traffic measurable by SEO that shows growth     * [[blog posts]] generate website traffic measurable by SEO that shows growth
     * Technically correct -- Paul     * Technically correct -- Paul
Line 18: Line 36:
     * So what!? – Investors     * So what!? – Investors
  
-  * Long term+=== Long term ===
     * Show that our documents are useful to running the company and getting investors     * Show that our documents are useful to running the company and getting investors
     * Generate the option to come on board RQ full-time     * Generate the option to come on board RQ full-time
Line 24: Line 42:
 ===== Products of the WG ===== ===== Products of the WG =====
   * [[Catalog of Narrative Resources Accessible on the Wiki]]   * [[Catalog of Narrative Resources Accessible on the Wiki]]
-   * Prioritized list of necessary narrative materials +    * Prioritized list of necessary narrative materials 
-    * Investor brief, accessible +      * Investor brief, accessible 
-    * Inspirational engagement brief, bigger than yourself +      * Inspirational engagement brief, bigger than yourself 
-    * Relevant technical concept and applicability in one or more contexts +      * Relevant technical concept and applicability in one or more contexts e.g. [[blog posts]] 
-   * Categorization of existing materials+    * Categorization of existing materials 
 +  * [[Project documentation tree]] 
 +    * provisional patents 
 +    * Project Plans 
 +    * Technical considerations (1 page briefs, top priority) 
 +    * Outcomes (So what!?) 
 +    * Foundational technology 
 +      * Applications 
 +      * Development path 
 +    * Financial considerations  
 +      * Budget template 
 +      * labor considerations 
 +      * contracting terms & conditions 
 +    * Market considerations (for-profit)  
 +    * Objective considerations (non-profit) 
 +    * Lessons learned 
 +  * [[Project Taxonomy / Ontology]] 
 +  * [[Project Glossary / Dictionary]]
  
-  * [[Confidential Access Workspace: Narrative Resources for Internal Team]] +==== Confidential Access Workspace ==== 
-   * Conceptual markers +  * [[Narrative Resources for Internal Team]] 
-   * Use cases +    * Conceptual markers 
-    * We need stories that provide conceptual entry points +    [[Use cases]] 
-    * Tell the story from the theory to the application and from the application to theory +      * We need stories that provide conceptual entry points 
- +      * Tell the story from the theory to the application and from the application to theory 
-  * [[Restricted Access Workspace: Narrative Resources for Investors]] +    *  Slide catalog
-    * [[Funding Development Documents]] +
-      * [[Grant Proposals]] +
-        * Non-profit entity typically has defined goal or program objective to achieve  +
-        * we must establish relevance +
-      * Contracts +
-      * [[Venture Financing Proposals]] +
-        * For-profit entity typically wants to understand the ROI  +
-        * both a direct monetary return and  +
-        * the potential for disrupting and/or making new markets. +
-      * Equity Agreement Proposals +
-      * Debt Agreements Proposals +
- +
-   * [[Pitch Decks]] and How we build them, e.g.  +
-     * Audience +
-       * Classic investor  +
-       * Academic partner  +
-       * ... +
-     Slide catalog+
        * Introduction        * Introduction
        * Mission        * Mission
        * Vision        * Vision
        * Applications        * Applications
-       * Application 1 Doubleclick +         * Application 1 Doubleclick 
-       * Application 2 Doubleclick+         * Application 2 Doubleclick 
 +         * ...
        * Technology Timeline        * Technology Timeline
        * Product List         * Product List 
        * Product Roadmap        * Product Roadmap
-       * Go To Market Roadmap 
-       * Investment Schedule 
        * Partners        * Partners
        * ...        * ...
Line 71: Line 87:
        * Product 1 Diagram        * Product 1 Diagram
        * Product 3 Diagram        * Product 3 Diagram
-       * Product 5 Diagram 
-       * Product 6 Diagram 
-       * Product 7 Diagram 
-       * Product 8 Diagram 
        * ...        * ...
     * [[Principles of Visualization]] describe our approach to making diagrams      * [[Principles of Visualization]] describe our approach to making diagrams 
 +
 +==== Restricted Access Workspace ====
 +  * [[Narrative Resources for Investors]]
 +    * [[Funding Development Documents]]
 +      * [[Grant Proposals]]
 +        * Non-profit entity typically has defined goal or program objective to achieve 
 +        * we must establish relevance
 +      * Contracts
 +      * [[Venture Financing Proposals]]
 +        * For-profit entity typically wants to understand the ROI 
 +        * both a direct monetary return and 
 +        * the potential for disrupting and/or making new markets.
 +      * Equity Agreement Proposals
 +      * Debt Agreements Proposals
 +    * [[Pitch Decks]]
 +      * Audience
 +        * Classic investor 
 +        * Academic partner 
 +        * ...
  
  
-  * [[Open Access WorkspaceNarrative Resources for Publication]]+==== Open Access Workspace ==== 
 +  * [[Narrative Resources for Publication]]
     * The middle-out approach to drawing out the relationship between a top-down and bottom-up approach     * The middle-out approach to drawing out the relationship between a top-down and bottom-up approach
       * our context       * our context
Line 102: Line 134:
      * Technical papers and presentations       * Technical papers and presentations 
  
-  * [[Project documentation tree]] +
-    * provisional patents +
-    * Project Plans +
-    * Technical considerations (1 page briefs, top priority) +
-    * Outcomes (So what!?) +
-    * Foundational technology +
-      * Applications +
-      * Development path +
-    * Financial considerations  +
-      * Budget template +
-      * labor considerations +
-      * contracting terms & conditions +
-    * Market considerations (for-profit)  +
-    * Objective considerations (non-profit) +
-    * Lessons learned +
-  * [[Project Taxonomy / Ontology]] +
-  * [[Project Glossary / Dictionary]]+
quantum/requisiteq.1712023311.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/01 22:01 by baw-geordie