www.build-a-world.org

March 10, 2024 Annotated Agenda

draft a multi-agent utility function for the WG
- success criteria for the working group for multiple stakeholders required products for several people
  - Short term
    - generate resources on a timely basis
    - do not burn out
    - Populate RQ.com landing page - single page - by Friday Mar 22
    - populate Requisite Q website front pages by the time the simulations are ready
    - develop corporate documents
    - develop Investor Documents
    - organize Paul's writings
    - blog posts generate website traffic measurable by SEO that shows growth
  - Long term
    - Show that our documents are useful to running the company and getting investors
    - Generate the option to come on board RQ full-time
- it is also the generalized utility function (e.g., minima, maxima, target, confluence of interest, required products, etc.)
- Products
  - Create Project documentation tree
  - Create Project Taxonomy
  - Create Project Glossary/Dictionary
establish housekeeping:
backlog *
- Gary will standup a RequisiteQ wiki under the https://www.build-a-world.com
calendar
- Geordie will standup a shared calendar
Working agreement
- Geordie, Nathan, and Gary are pleased to work together to define and articulate project narratives.
catalog our understanding of the audiences and media for narratives
- We need to add a catalog of resources accessible on the wiki
- We have shared workspaces based on audiences
  - Internal project team (Confidential access)
  - Investors (Restricted access)
 Pitch Deck Evolution
• The top 10 +/- 2deck (top-down approach) “What Amit needs, . . .”
o Classic investor pitch deck
o How can we array the data for each slide in the deck
o What is the visualization
 Qbits, squids, in a helium bath
 Hardware  Problem Space  Solution Space
o Amit will join the Sunday narrative working group meeting
• The middle-out approach to drawing out the relationship between a top-down and bottom-up approach
o our context
o the problem space
o the potential solution space
o our product(s)
 Project Plans
• Technical considerations (1 page briefs, top priority)
o Outcomes (So what!?)
o Foundational technology
o Applications
o Development path
• Technical & Financial Considerations
• Financial considerations
o Budget template
o labor considerations
o contracting terms & conditions
 Market considerations (for-profit)
 Objective considerations (non-profit)
 Lessons learned  provisional patents
o Public (Open access)
 Recruitment
 Media resources
• Audio
• Video
• Web site
• Written content
o Op ed
o Magazine articles
o Abstracts for national and international fora
o Technical papers and presentations
• Funding Development
o Grants
o Contracts
o Financing
 Equity
 Debt
 Grants
o Audience drives the presentation
 Non-profit entity typically has defined goal or program objective to achieve and we must establish relevance
 For-profit entity typically wants to understand the ROI both a direct monetary return and the potential for disrupting and/or making new markets.
o Find the way to yes
 Only poke the bears we have to

- make a shortlist of necessary narrative materials
- review existing materials for suitability
Things that we need to include . . .
• Investor brief, accessible
• Inspirational engagement brief, bigger than yourself
• Relevant technical concept and applicability in one or more contexts
Priorities
• Technically correct – Paul
• Emotional hooks – Amit
• So what!? – Investors
Concerns
• Conceptual markers
• Use cases
• We need stories that provide conceptual entry points
• Tell the story from the theory to the application and from the application to theory